Epistemology of Thomas S. Kuhn’s Shifting Paradigm and Its Relevance to Islamic Science

Authors

  • Endrika Widdia Putri Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
  • Lingga Yuwana Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Muh. Bahrul Afif Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/kjie.v4i1.48

Keywords:

Epistemology, Shifting Paradigm, Thomas S. Kuhn

Abstract

This article aims to explain the epistemology of Thomas S. Kuhn's concept of Shifting Paradigm (1922-1996), a postmodernist with its philosophical, physical, and historical expertise, and the relevance of his thinking in Islamic science. The research is a qualitative study using the epistemological point of view to analyze. Kuhn’s view on the Shifting Paradigm is analyzed based on the important points in the epistemology: the source and substance of knowledge; the instrument of knowledge; how to acquire knowledge; the theory of truth; and  the validation of the truth of knowledge. The study finds that, first, the source and substance of science is the history of science. Second, the instrument of knowledge is the paradigm of science. Third, knowledge is acquired from the shifting process from the pre paradigm, normal science, anomalies, crises, to a new paradigm. Fourth, normal science is the theory of the truth. Fifth, the anomaly becomes the validation of the truth. Kuhn’s thinking of the Shifting Paradigm is relevant to Islamic science because it can be used as a method to explain the transformation of Islamic science. This paper is vital in discussing the relevance of Kuhn’s thinking to Islamic science. Despite many significant numbers of text on Kuhn's thinking, researchers have not found a text that especially discusses on the epistemology of the Kuhn’s conception of Shifting Paradigme and point out its relevance to the transformation of Islamic science.


References

Almas, A. F. (2018). Sumbangan Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn dalam Ilmu dan Pendidikan (Penerapan Metode Problem Based Learning dan Discovery Learning). At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam, 3(1), 89-106.

Bagus, L. (1996). Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Damayanti, S. N., Ma'ruf, H. M., Sudrajat, A., & Sudrajat, S. (2019). Epistemologi Saintifik Thomas S. Kuhn Terhadap Munculnya Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. JIPSINDO, 6(1), 25-45.

Fuad, F., Wibisono, K., & Hadi, P. H. (2015). Kebenaran Ilmiah Dalam Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Dan Karl R. Popper: Suatu Kajian Hermeneutika Dan Kontribusinya Bagi Masa Depan Ilmu. Jurnal Filsafat, 25(2), 252-276.

Fuller, S. (2001). “Thomas Kuhn: the Wrong Person at the Right Place at the Right Time.” The Review of Politics. 63(2).

Damayanti, S. N., Ma'ruf, H. M., Sudrajat, A., & Sudrajat, S. (2019). Epistemologi Saintifik Thomas S. Kuhn Terhadap Munculnya Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. JIPSINDO, 6(1), 25-45.

Hamali, S. (2015). Asketisme Dalam Islam Perspektif Psikologi Agama. Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama, 10(2), 202-215.

Ghulsyani, M. (1986). The Holy Quran and The Sciences of Nature The Review of Politics. Bandung: Mizan.

Jena, Y. (2012). Thomas Kuhn Tentang Perkembangan Sains dan Kritik Larry Laudan. MELINTAS, 28(2), 161-181

Lubis, A. Y. (2014). Filsafat Ilmu: Klasik hingga Kontemporer. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Mauskopf, S. H. (2012). Thomas S. Kuhn and the Chemical revolution. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 42(5), 551-556.

Nurkhalis, N. (2012). Konstruksi Teori Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 11(2), 79-99.

Nye, M. J. (2012). Thomas Kuhn, case histories, and revolutions. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 42(5), 557-561.

Orman, T. F. (2016). Paradigm” as a central concept in Thomas Kuhn’s thought. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(10), 47-52.

Rahman, F. (2010). Islam. Terj. Ahsin Mohammad. Bandung: Penerbit Pustaka.

Rif’I, B. dan Mud’is, H. (2010). Filsafat Tasawuf. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Suhartono, S. (2011). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: ar-Ruzz Media.

Syafi’ie, I. (2000). Konsep Ilmu Pengetahuan dalam al-Qur’an. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Trisakti, S. B. (2008). Thomas Kuhn dan Tradisi-Inovasi dalam Langkah Metodologis Riset Ilmiah. Jurnal Filsafat, 18(3), 223-240.

Ulya, I., & Abid, N. (2015). Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya terhadap Keilmuan Islam. Fikrah, 3(2), 249-276.

Watloly, A. (2013). Sosio-Epistemologi: Membangun Pengetahuan Berwatak Sosial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Yuana, K.A. (2010). The Greatest Philosopher: 100 Tokoh Filsuf Barat dari Abad 6 SM - Abad 21 yang Menginspirasi Dunia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Zaprulkhan. (2016). Filsafat Ilmu: Sebuah Analisis Kontemporer. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Zubaedi, & friends. (2007). Filsafat Barat: Dari Logika Baru Rene Descartes hingga Revolusi Sains ala Thomas Kuhn. Yogyakarta: ar-Ruzz Media.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-19

How to Cite

Putri, E. W., Yuwana, L., & Afif, M. B. (2020). Epistemology of Thomas S. Kuhn’s Shifting Paradigm and Its Relevance to Islamic Science. Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24036/kjie.v4i1.48

Issue

Section

Articles