Behavior and Factors Causing Plagiarism Among Undergraduate Students in Accomplishing the Coursework on Religion Education Subject

Engkizar Engkizar, Alfurqan Alfurqan, Murniyetti Murniyetti, Indah Muliati


The objectives of this study were to analyze the behavior and causal factors of plagiarism among the undergraduate students in accomplishing their coursework in Islamic religion subject. The study used methods combination of qualitative and quantitative research or Exploratory mixed methods designs. Qualitative data were taken from 15 papers of group works in the subjects of Islamic religion, while quantitative data were taken using questionnaires towards 80 students who are taking course in Islamic religion at State University of Padang (UNP). Data taken from papers of groupwork were analyzed thematically with method of data collection, data reduction, data presentation and taking conclusion, while questionnaires were analyzed descriptively using SPSS software version 18.0 for Windows.Results of the document analysis found that there are three forms of behavior of student plagiarism in accomplishing the coursework, first:  by quoting the entire writings of the other person without mentioning the source, second: by quoting part / half of the text/writings of others, third: by quoting the writing of others then converted into their own statements. While there are eight factors that cause plagiarism which are: not understand about plagiarism, the student’s instant culture in accomplishing academic tasks, the high volume of academic tasks given by lecturers, students’ low interest in reading, not enough time to find the answer in the book, the ease of Information Technology, low purchasing power and lack of knowledge in how to write a scientific papers.


Behavior, plagiarism, undergraduate students, coursework

Full Text:



Amiri, F., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2016). On Iranian EFL Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(2), 115–131.

Babaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2017). Plagiarism Among Iranian Graduate Students of Language Studies: Perspectives and Causes. Ethics and Behavior, 27(3), 240–258.

Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2016). Constructivism: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 7(4), 66–70.

Benamara, F., Taboada, M., & Mathieu, Y. (2017). Evaluative language beyond bags ofwords: Linguistic insights and computational applications. Computational Linguistics, 43(1), 201–264.

Biagioli, M. (2012). Recycling Texts or Stealing Time?: Plagiarism, Authorship, and Credit in Science. International Journal of Cultural Property, 19(3), 453–476.

Breen, L., & Maassen, M. (2005). Reducing the incidence of plagiarism in an undergraduate course: The role of education. Issues in Educational Research, 15(1), 1–16.

Camara, S. K., Eng-Ziskin, S., Wimberley, L., Dabbour, K. S., & Lee, C. M. (2017). Predicting Students’ Intention to Plagiarize: an Ethical Theoretical Framework. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(1), 43–58.

Carroll, J. (2002). A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education. In Jpd (Vol. 4, Issue 1). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

Chen, Y., & Chou, C. (2017). Are We on the Same Page? College Students’ and Faculty’s Perception of Student Plagiarism in Taiwan. Ethics and Behavior, 27(1), 53–73.

Choo, T. E., & Paull, M. (2013). Reducing the prevalence of plagiarism: A model for staff, students and universities. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 283–298.

Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25.

Cook, T. (2014). The scourge of plagiary: Perversions of imitation in the English renaissance. University of Toronto Quarterly, 83(1), 39–63.

Culwin, F., & Lancaster, T. (2001). Plagiarism issues for higher education. Vine, 31(2), 36–41.

Damri, D., Engkizar, E., & Anwar, F. (2017). Hubungan Self-Efficacy Dan Prokrastinasi Akademik Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Tugas Perkuliahan. JURNAL EDUKASI: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 3(1), 74.

Debnath, J. (2016). Plagiarism: A silent epidemic in scientific writing–Reasons, recognition and remedies. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 72(2), 164–167.

Demerath, P. (2011). My Word! Plagiarism and College Culture by Susan D. Blum. In American Anthropologist (Vol. 113, Issue 1). Cornell University Press.

Divan, A., Bowman, M., & Seabourne, A. (2015). Reducing unintentional plagiarism amongst international students in the biological sciences: An embedded academic writing development programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(3), 358–378.

Dreher, H. (2007). Automatic Conceptual Analysis for Plagiarism Detection. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 4, 601–614.

Eaton, S. E. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Institutional Policy Definitions of Plagiarism: A Pan-Canadian University Study. Interchange, 48(3), 271–281.

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs - Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 PART2), 2134–2156.

Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark traid of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216.

Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2017). Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(8), 1220–1227.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications 8thEdition (Global Edi). Pearson Education Limited.

Giammarco, E. A., Atkinson, B., Baughman, H. M., Veselka, L., & Vernon, P. A. (2013). The relation between antisocial personality and the perceived ability to deceive. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 246–250.

Gokmenoglu, T. (2017). A Review of Literature: Plagiarism in the Papers of Turkish Context. Higher Education Studies, 7(3), 161.

Gómez, J., Salazar, I., & Vargas, P. (2013). Dishonest Behavior and Plagiarism by University Students: An Application to Management Studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 766–770.

Guy, S., Kashima, Y., Walker, I., & O’Neill, S. (2014). Investigating the effects of knowledge and ideology on climate change beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 421–429.

Haitch, R. (2016). Stealing or sharing? Cross‐cultural issues of plagiarism in an open‐source era. Teaching Theology & Religion, 19(3), 264–275.

Hamamah, H. (2017). An analysis on the circumstance of research article writing in English in Indonesia. Linguista: Jurnal Imliah Bahasa Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 1(2), 101–110.

Harris, R. A. (2002). The Plagiarism Handbook: Strategies for Preventing, Detecting, and Dealing with Plagiarism. In Adolescence (Vol. 37). Pyrczak Pub.

Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2018). Plagiarism in research. Getting to Good: Research Integrity in the Biomedical Sciences, 18(1), 262–273.

Hong, J. (2012). The state of phishing attacks. Communications of the ACM, 55(1), 74–81.

Honig, B., & Bedi, A. (2012). The fox in the hen house: A critical examination of plagiarism among members of the academy of management. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(1), 101–123.

Hosny, M., & Fatima, S. (2014). Attitude of Students Towards Cheating and Plagiarism: University Case Study. Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(8), 748–757.

Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2015). Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism. Ethics and Behavior, 25(3), 233–255.

Husain, F. M., Al-Shaibani, G. K. S., & Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2017). Perceptions of and Attitudes toward Plagiarism and Factors Contributing to Plagiarism: a Review of Studies. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(2), 167–195.

Jiang, H., Emmerton, L., & McKauge, L. (2013). Academic integrity and plagiarism: A review of the influences and risk situations for health students. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(3), 369–380.

Jones, M., & Sheridan, L. (2015). Back translation: an emerging sophisticated cyber strategy to subvert advances in ‘digital age’plagiarism detection and prevention. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 712–724.

Larkham, P. J., & Manns, S. (2002). Plagiarism and its treatment in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(4), 339–349.

Mambu, J. E. (2013). Appropriations of policies related to L2 academic writing practices in an Indonesian EFL teacher education program. Indonesian JELT, 2(1), 15–41.

Martin, B. R. (2013). Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. Research Policy, 42(5), 1005–1014.

Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2016). MIXED METHOD DESIGN: Principles and Procedures. In Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures. Routledge.

Moten, A. R. (2014). Academic dishonesty and misconduct: Curbing plagiarism in the Muslim world. Intellectual Discourse, 22(2), 167–189.

Murniyetti, M., Engkizar, E., & Anwar, F. (2016). Pola Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Karakter Terhadap Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 7(2), 156–166.

Murtaza, G., Zafar, S., Bashir, I., & Hussain, I. (2013). EVALUATION OF STUDENT’S PERCEPTION AND BEHAVIOR TOWARDS PLAGIARISM IN PAKISTANI UNIVERSITIES. Acta Bioethica, 19(1), 125–130.

Newton, F. J., Wright, J. D., & Newton, J. D. (2014). Skills training to avoid inadvertent plagiarism: Results from a randomised control study. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(6), 1180–1193.

Pecorari, D., & Petrić, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 47(3), 269–302.

PH. and Chang, Y. C. (2009). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Research Design (Vol. 4, Issue June). Sage publications.

Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., & Petrovecki, M. (2008). On academic plagiarism in Europe. An analytical approach based on four studies. Digithum, 0(10), 13–19.

Ramzan, M., Munir, M. A., Siddique, N., & Asif, M. (2012). Awareness about plagiarism amongst university students in Pakistan. Higher Education, 64(1), 73–84.

Rice, R. A., & Greenberg, R. (2000). Cacao cultivation and the conservation of biological diversity. Ambio, 29(3), 167–173.

Ruse-Khan, H. G. (2014). Intellectual property offences. In Routledge Handbook of Transnational Criminal Law (pp. 312–327). Routledge.

Sariffuddin, S., Astuti, K. D., & Arthur, R. (2017). Investigating Plagiarism: The Form and The Motivation in Performing Plagiarism in High Education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 11(2), 172–178.

Seadle, M. (2016). Quantifying Research Integrity. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 8(5), 1–141.

Sentleng, M. P., & King, L. (2012). Plagiarism among undergraduate students in the Faculty of Applied Science at a South African higher education institution. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 78(1), 57–67.

Sheard, J., & Dick, M. (2011). Computing student practices of cheating and plagiarism: A decade of change. ITiCSE’11 - Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science, 233–237.

Sikes, P. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collusion in academic research writing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 13–24.

Singh, H. P., & Guram, N. (2014). Knowledge and attitude of dental professionals of North India toward plagiarism. North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(1), 6–11.

Sowden, C. (2005). Plagiarism and the culture of multilingual students in higher education abroad. ELT Journal, 59(3), 226–233.

Subedi, D. (2016). Explanatory Sequential Mixed Method Design as the Third Research Community of Knowledge Claim. American Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 4, 2016, Pages 570-577, 4(7), 570–577.

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.

Vani, K., & Gupta, D. (2016). Study on extrinsic text plagiarism detection techniques and tools. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 9(5), 9–23.

Vogt, W. P., Gardner, D. C., Haeffele, L. M., & Vogt, E. R. (2015). Selecting the right analyses for your data: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 52, Issue 05). Guilford Publications.

Yamamoto, S., Bamba, T., Sano, A., Kodama, Y., Imamura, M., Obata, A., & Fukusaki, E. (2012). Metabolite profiling of soy sauce using gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry and analysis of correlation with quantitative descriptive analysis. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 114(2), 170–175.

Yinlan, C., & Chou, C. (2017). Are We on the Same Page? College Students’ and Faculty’s Perception of Student Plagiarism in Taiwan. Ethics & Behavior, 27(1), 53–73.

Zalnur, M. (2012). Plagiarisme Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Dalam Membuat Tugas-Tugas Perkuliahan Pada Fakultas Tarbiyah Iain Imam Bonjol Padang. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 19(1), 55–65.

Zientek, L. R. (2008). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(4), 729–734.


Article metrics

Abstract views : 1672 | views : 0


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education

License URL:

Creative Commons License
Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education by Universitas Negeri Padang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Based on a work at p- ISSN 2541-6588 e- ISSN 2549-4783